This is a catchweight professional boxing match contested between WBA (Regular) lightweight champion Gervonta Davis and former WBC interim lightweight champion Ryan Garcia. The match is set to take place at a catchweight of 136 lbs, with a 10 lbs rehydration clause.

Here is everything you need to know: Davis vs Garcia boxing fight 

Title: It Doesn’t Get Any Better Than This
Time: Saturday, 8pm ET / 5pm PT
Date: April 22, 2023
Venue: T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas
Address: Paradise, Nevada, US
Broadcast: Showtime PPV

Streaming Anywhere: FitePass PPV

Gervonta Davis vs Ryan Garcia tale of the tape

Gervonta Davis

Nickname: Tank
Age: 28
Hometown: Baltimore, Maryland
Record: 28-0-0
Height: 5 ft 5+1⁄2 in (166 cm)
Weight: 134.5 lbs (61.14 kg)
Reach: 67½” (171 cm)
KOS: 26 (92.86%)
Stance: Southpaw
Recognition: WBA (Regular) lightweight champion

Ryan Garcia

Nickname: King
Age: 24
Hometown: Los Alamitos, California
Record:23-0-0
Height: 5 ft 10 in (178 cm)
Weight: 130 lbs (59.09 kg)
Reach: 70″ (178 cm)
KOS: 19 (82.61%)
Stance: Orthodox
Recognition: WBC interim lightweight champion

Tank holds multiple world championships in three weight classes, including the WBA (Regular) lightweight title. He is ranked as the second best active lightweight by BoxRec, third by ESPN, and Fifth by the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and The Ring magazine. His knockout-to-win percentage of 93% reflects his renowned punching prowess.

While, King was the interim lightweight champion of the World Boxing Council during 2021. The Ring, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board, and ESPN all have him as the sixth best active lightweight in the world as of May 2022 although BoxRec has him in tenth place.

The unbeatable Tank Davis faces battle against the lightning-fast King Ryan in a match that has boxing fans salivating. In a clash of aggressive, dynamic styles and colorful personalities, two of boxing’s most popular competitors square off.

Cheapest way to watch Click Here: Garcia vs Davis ShowTime PPV

The Gervonta Davis vs. Ryan Garcia fight will be broadcast on Showtime PPV and DAZN PPV. In the United Kingdom, subscribers to DAZN can watch the fight live, while Australians can watch it on DAZN PPV.

Showtime is available to stream on many different platforms, including the Amazon Fire TV, Android TV, Apple TV, Roku, and Xbox ONE.

Showtime is charging $84.99 for the PPV event, while DAZN is charging $60.

If you have trouble streaming the PPV, or if it seems much expensive, you can check the following platform FitePass PPV for a budget-friendly and trouble-free streaming.

Davis vs. Garcia Fight Card

Below is the full fight schedule, along with the most up-to-date odds.

• Gervonta “Tank” Davis -240 vs. Ryan Garcia +200, super lightweight
• David Morrell (c) -2000 vs. Yamaguchi Falcao +1000, WBA “regular” super middleweight title
• Bektemir Melikuziev -1400 vs. Gabriel Rosado +800, super middleweight
• Elija Garcia -1400 vs. Kevin Zambrano +800, middleweight

Of course, the Garcia vs. Davis fight is the main event. Due to their respective excellent unbeaten records, a matchup between the two young superstars has been heavily anticipated. The match will take place at a catchweight of 136 pounds, barely one pound over the lightweight limit, despite the fact that both Davis and Garcia have won secondary championships at super lightweight.

Note that the fights on the undercard are just as exciting as the main event.

Proper Bet Odds for Davis vs. Garcia

Boxing fans can wager on more than just the moneyline. In addition to betting on a straight winner, sportsbooks provide a plethora of different betting alternatives. The most active prop markets for this fight are listed below.

Method of Victory

• Davis by points or decision: +500
• Davis by KO/TKO: -135
• Draw: +1600
• Garcia by points or decision: +650
• Garcia by KO/TKO: +380

Exact Method of Victory

• Davis by KO: +185
• Davis by TKO: +125
• Davis by DQ: +10000
• Davis by UD: +650
• Davis by SD: +2300
• Davis by MD: +3400
• Garcia by KO: +650
• Garcia by TKO: +380
• Garcia by DQ: +10000
• Garcia by UD: +900
• Garcia by SD: +2500
• Garcia by MD: +4200

To Win in 60 Seconds

• Davis to Win in 60 Seconds: +9000
• Either to Win in 60 Seconds: +6000
• Garcia to Win in 60 Seconds: +15000

Will the Fight Go the Distance?

• Yes: +270
• No: -380

Total Rounds in Fight

• Over 7.5: -134
• Under 7.5: +106

To Be Knocked Down

• Davis: +290
• Garcia: -164
• Both to be knocked down 2+ times: +3000
• Knockdown in round 12: +2400
• 4+ knockdowns in fight: +1200

“Hypogonadism is defined as a clinical syndrome complex that comprises symptoms and signs as well as biochemical evidence of testosterone deficiency.”

The inception of The Men’s Health Clinic was inspired by an appreciation that Testosterone Deficiency is a poorly understood, under-recognised and under-appreciated health concern.  Terms such as the “Manopause” and Andropause which compare low testosterone to the female menopause are unhelpful and trivialise the condition.  The pathological mechanism that causes low testosterone is very distinct from the female menopause, which is a defined period in a female’s timeline when she no longer ovulates, her periods cease and her oestrogen lowers.  The misassociation may be in part due to the fact that oestrogen is considered the female sex-hormone and testosterone is considered the male sex-hormone. This is also misleading as men and women need both testosterone and oestrogen for overall health and well-being. In men, testosterone is converted to oestradiol by the aromatase enzyme. Oestrogen is integral for cardiovascular health, bone strength, brain function and fertility.

Testosterone Deficiency has been trivialised by the media.  In fact, men’s health in general has been over-looked and dismissed by everyone, including men. It’s only recently, that the importance of testosterone in physical and psychological health is being fully appreciated. Unfortunately, the NHS places a greater emphasis on a curative medical model for several reasons; it’s under-financed and under-resourced, used and abused by all and sundry based on a false sense of entitlement. The NHS is used as a sacrificial political pawn, politicians subtly manipulate the general public with false claims and promises.  Prevention is fundamental to sustainable positive health outcomes, but when finances are diverted to firefighting rather than addressing foundations, causation is a secondary consideration.  Budgets need to demonstrate outcomes.

Testosterone has long been associated with Bodybuilding and athletes abusing the anabolic effects of the hormone.  The use of testosterone and other Androgenic Anabolic Steroids (AAS) has seeped into mainstream culture, with men not fully understanding the long-term consequences of abuse.  AAS are a common cause of Testosterone Deficiency.  Post Cycle Therapy (PCT) is not a reliable method of reigniting your Hypo-pituitary Gonadal (HPG) axis, nature often defies science.  Anabolic steroids have a place in medicine, they were designed to help with patients suffering with chronic wasting diseases, immunocompromised and cancer patients.  However, doctors appear to have an aversion to anything testosterone related, believing that the reported negative symptoms are simply an excuse for attaining a beach body or an unfair competitive edge.

GPs have 10-minute appointments, most see about 40 patients a day, from coughs and colds to cancer to mental health and social issues to… It’s no wonder the negative symptoms of low testosterone are often dismissed in an otherwise healthy looking male.  Men are often either offered antidepressants for their low mood and/or Viagra for their low libido and erectile dysfunction. Doctors have a curative rather than preventative mindset because they simply do not have the time to address causation.

Education is fundamental to implementing sustainable change.  Men have turned to the internet for guidance. We have access to everything and anything, communities have arisen, some positive like TRT in the UK; and some bad that offer false promises, simply feeding confirmation bias.  Testosterone is marketed as a lifestyle drug, not a medical treatment to treat a medical condition. This must end.

Dr Robert Stevens MBChB MRCGP Dip.FIPT

A poll of 2,000 adults revealed that an average of three-and-a-half hours a day is spent watching television – a total of 1,248 hours a year.

Over the average adult lifetime, this will mean TV fans will immerse themselves in 3,639 films in the comfort of their own home, as well as watching a staggering 31,507 episodes of TV shows.

But the average household will have two arguments a week over what to watch and more than half of those polled would struggle if they only had one TV between them.

As a result, the research by LG Electronics found the typical British home has two TVs, upgrading their set every six years on average.

It also emerged a quarter of those polled said their viewing experience is ‘ruined’ by the quality of their TV, so they will often venture elsewhere, such as a friend’s house or the pub, in search of a superior screen.

James Thomas, home entertainment product manager at LG UK said: “The Golden Age of Content is here, but similar to the golden age of film and cinema, it won’t be fully appreciated until it’s over.

“Everyone has a favourite series to sink into at the end of a day, but many are missing out on the full experience due to the limitations of an old TV.”

The study also found that six in 10 adults went as far as to say they would be lost without their television set.

But poor sound quality and glare on the screen are among the nation’s biggest bugbears.

People talking over a favourite show, others asking questions and poor visual quality were also among the greatest annoyances, according to the OnePoll research.

Fifteen per cent also said they get frustrated by having too much choice, with adults spending an average of 2,943 hours over their lifetime browsing and deciding what to watch.

And following a decision, they will watch 11,278 different series over a lifetime – whether that’s just one episode or an entire boxset.

After revealing the nation’s love of TV, LG partnered with Realeyes – the world’s leading ‘emotion AI’ company – to conduct an experiment on identical twins which compared the differences between physical and emotional response when watching Game of Thrones on a 2019 LG OLED TV verses a 2013 LED TV.

The experiment was performed on identical twin social media influencers, Henry and William Wade, at the LG UK test facility in Weybridge.

The twins were separated into blacked-out TV immersion rooms where they simultaneously watched ‘The Battle of the Bastards’ – IMDB’s highest-rated Game of Thrones episode – on the different TVs.

William watched on a 2019 set, while Henry viewed a 2013 TV, representing the most common type of TV in homes across the UK.

Realeyes’ AI platform analysed the facial expressions, head movements and body language from more than 144,000 frames of video footage captured of each twin.

Their physical responses were also measured using heart rate monitors.

The results revealed the 2019 OLED TV held 25 per cent more attention than the 2013 LED, and throughout the episode, 27 emotional peaks were observed on the newer TV compared to just four peaks on the older model.

Happiness, which in the context of the experiment was linked to level of entertainment, was also three times higher.

Overall, the 2019 TV provided a 15 per cent more intense experience from a positive emotional standpoint.

Mihkel Jäätma, CEO and co-founder of Realeyes, said: “This experiment by LG was a really interesting and fun way to utilise our ground-breaking AI technology.

“We’ve taught computers to read and understand human emotions and attention, which allows us to offer scientifically sound measurements of a viewer’s immersion.”

In short, the Baby Boomer generation is, in increasing numbers, reaching retirement age, with a growing number of seniors opting to stop working and enjoy their lives outside of their careers. 

With a large percentage of the newly retired opting not to downsize to smaller homes, many of the UK’s retirees are likely to spend the last decades of their lives living inside the same homes that they raised their children in — homes that, in many cases, aren’t designed for seniors. 

This brings with it some safety concerns, from the risks associated with stairs to the sheer work that’s involved in maintaining a large home. If you parents, grandparents or other senior people that you care about live alone in their family home, you can help them to stay safe.

Below, we’ve shared three simple but effective home safety tactics that you can use to make life safer, easier and more comfortable for your parents or grandparents, allowing them to maintain their independence while staying safe and secure throughout retirement. 

Make Sure Their Bathroom is Safe

If you’re a caregiver for seniors, or simply want to make sure that your aging parents are safe, it can help to start by checking their bathrooms for safety hazards.

Bathrooms can be risky spaces, particularly for seniors. Wet surfaces can often lead to falls and painful injuries — injuries that can affect everything from mobility to mental health. 

Good bathroom safety tactics include adding a grab bar in the shower to reduce the risk of a slip or fall. It can also help to install a rubber mat, or switch from a combined bathtub and shower to a less risky walk-in shower design.

Other ideas include installing night lighting, which can make it easier to navigate the bathroom in the dark, and adding either a sitting surface or a bathing chair to the shower area to ensure that mobility doesn’t interfere with bathing. 

Identify and Remove Fire Hazards

Fires can start alarmingly quickly, with something as small as a stray candle or as normal as a forgotten-about oven all it takes to start a blaze that can damage a home and put the safety of its occupants at risk.

If you’re concerned about fire risks inside a senior’s home, check for potential fire hazards and take steps to mitigate them. This can include checking electrical cords and removing anything that’s frayed or otherwise damaged, or checking for hazards close to ovens and heaters. 

If your parents’ or grandparents’ home contains cooking equipment that can spit grease around the kitchen, consider asking them to avoid using it or replace it with a safer option. 

Pots, deep fryers, pans and other cooking equipment rank among the most common sources of house fires, making it worth bringing up if you have concerns about a loved one’s safety. It can also help to check for fire risks, such as towels or tissues, placed close to hot items. 

Make Using the Stairs Safer

While stairs are rarely a hazard for healthy retirees in their 70s, they can be a significant safety risk for seniors in their 80s and 90s. As such, if your parents or grandparents live in a home with stairs, it’s important to make them as safe as possible.

By far the most effective way to make stairs safer, particularly for seniors with injuries or issues walking up and down the stairs frequently, is to install a stairlift. This allows even someone with significant mobility issues to use the stairs with a far lower risk of falls or other injuries.

If a stairlift isn’t economically feasible, or if you think it isn’t necessary, there are still steps that you can take to make the stairs safer. Check that they’re finished in a material that provides a great deal of grip, even if it’s wet or dusty. 

It’s also important to make sure that the stairs are visually differentiated. Many slips, falls and other injuries involving stairs occur in the evening and at night, when it can be difficult for those with partial vision to clearly see where one step ends and the next begins.